Showing posts with label Insurance Coverage for ASD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Insurance Coverage for ASD. Show all posts

Monday, June 16, 2014

Medi-Cal Funding For ABA Fails

Description: http://www.autismspeaks.org/sites/default/files/images/government_affairs/ca.stein_.jpg
Senate President pro
Tem Darrell Steinberg
Medi-Cal Funding For ABA Fails, But New Option Emerges
DHCS directed to add behavioral health treatment to state's Medicaid program, consult with stakeholders
SACRAMENTO (June 13, 2014) -- A $50 million appropriation sought for Medi-Cal to provide behavioral health treatment for autism failed to make the final cut in California's state budget negotiations. But the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) will be directed to incorporate the treatment in Medi-Cal, which is the state's Medicaid program, and request the Legislature for an appropriation.    "We are disappointed that this appropriation failed, depriving hundreds of California children with autism with access to medically necessary treatment that can make an enormous improvement in their quality of life," said Kristin Jacobson, state policy chair for Autism Speaks. "This is particularly frustrating given the acknowledgment by at least two state agencies that delaying treatment causes irreparable harm.         "However, we take heart in the Legislature's directive to DHCS to right this wrong by building the benefit into Medi-Cal," she added. "We commend Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (left) for his continued leadership on behalf of the California autism community." The issue arose in 2013 when the Healthy Families program was shuttered, resulting in the transfer of thousands of children into Medi-Cal. Children who were receiving Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) behavioral treatment in Healthy Families lost the service when they entered Medi-Cal.   An attempt was made in the recently concluded state budget negotiations between the Legislature and Gov. Jerry Brown to add a $50 million Medi-Cal appropriation to restore the coverage, but it failed to make the final agreement. In its place, behavioral health treatment was determined to be a Medi-Cal benefit and DCHS, which administers the program, was directed to start the administrative process of including it.   That process will require outreach to federal Medicaid authorities as well as stakeholders. DCHS would need to seek statutory authority on how to implement the new benefit, and determine eligibility criteria, provider participation criteria, utilization controls and a delivery system structure. The department would be required to develop an appropriations request, conditioned on assurances of federal financial participation.    The Legislature directed DHCS to add the benefit when it is federally required.   "We believe ABA coverage is already required under Medicaid given successful lawsuits in other states, such as Florida, and the federal government's recent approval of ABA benefits added by Louisiana and Washington state," Jacobson said. "The Louisiana and Washington plans now cover behavioral health treatment as a benefit under EPSDT (Early Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment).    "EPSDT benefits may not vary from state to state, so if the benefit is valid in one state it should be required in all states," she said.

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Autism costs Americans an estimated $126 billion annually, a number that has more than tripled since 2006



Autism costs Americans an estimated $126 billion annually, a number that has more than tripled since 2006. For me, this begs the question, what's going to happen to the cost of care as more and more young adults age out of the system, and we want comprehensive programs, where their education continues beyond how to stuff & lick envelopes? What's that going to cost and who will help us then? 

The costs of providing care for each person with autism affected by intellectual disability through his or her lifespan are $2.3 million in the U.S. and £1.5 million ($2.4 million) in the U.K. The lifetime costs of caring for individuals who are not impacted by intellectual disability are $1.4 million in the U.S. and £917,000 in the U.K. (equivalent to $1.46 million) and from where I sit it will only grow as the ASD population increases and more families gain access to critical ABA services and the burden on families has been outrageous. On that note, my thanks goes out to everyone in our federal, state and local government and local advocates who have pushed so long and hard for insurance to cover ABA, and thanks to the affordable care act for eliminating the pre-existing condition barrier to insurance.  

Nick and I began his autism journey with no options except to pay out of pocket or forgo critical services. I am grateful for the progress and shared responsibility between families, private insurance and state and federally funded programs.  Until Obama care, I was unable to change or shop for new insurance because I could not risk being denied. I remember before Nick was diagnosed - he had stopped talking and was suddenly withdrawn - I called my insurance and said "I need my child to see a speech pathologist". The representative on the phone asked me why, and I said "He suddenly stopped talking and I've been told he needs to be evaluated right away".  She said "I can't refer you without a diagnosis" and we went back and forth, I had no diagnosis that was why he needed to be seen, and she held firm that without a diagnosis he could not be seen! I told her that the professional I had spoken to said he should be evaluated for autism. Her reply "I'm sorry but we don't cover autism. I can't help you, and she hung up".  I was blown away. That was cruel, and at the time I remember thinking this is crazy!!!  That was one of the many moments that turned me from a mom into an pissed off advocate determined to get help for families. Here in California thousands of families, state agencies and non profits have worked hard for years and now our families have coverage for speech, OT and ABA (although not always without a fight).  At the same time, we can stop take a breath and be thankful for the places where we have made progress. 

But we're not out of the woods yet, we will need to stay diligent as many states are still fighting for insurance reform as it relates to autism and we've yet to uncover the challenges when it come to our kids who are aging out.  What's going to happen to the cost of care when there's no school everyday and we want more for our children than day programs that find them just sitting around being taught to lick envelopes? What's that going to cost and who will help us then? Sigh, the journey continues. 


Here are links to where I got my statistics and different perspectives on how Obama Care impacts autism care.





Sunday, October 13, 2013

How the ACA Will Affect People with Autism - One Journalists Perspective


I just found this article today about Autism and the Affordable Care act, it's a perspective worth sharing.

Q&A: How ACA Will Affect People With Autism 


Braylon Smith, of Carl Junction, Mo., undergoes Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) treatment for autism in his home. The Affordable Care Act largely leaves decisions on autism coverage to states. (AP)
Autism advocates celebrated what they thought was a major victory when President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act in 2010:  They expected the law to require all insurance companies to cover pricey, potentially lifelong treatments for those with the incurable condition.
But instead of creating a national standard for autism coverage, the administration bowed to political pressure from states and insurers and left it to states to define, within certain parameters, the “essential benefits” that insurance companies must provide.
Coverage requirements for autism treatments, such as behavioral counseling and speech and occupational therapy, already vary from state to state.  Far from smoothing out those differences, critics say the ACA will add a new layer of complexity.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) says it will consider setting a national standard in 2016. Until then, states will decide what autism treatments insurance companies must cover.

What is autism, how is it treated and at what cost?

Autism is a mental disorder affecting more than 2 million Americans and tens of millions of people worldwide. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, one in every 88 children in the U.S has the condition, and the number is rising. Paying for treatment can be financially catastrophic to families.
Symptoms of autism first appear from birth to early childhood, and include mild to severe social, communication and behavioral challenges as well as repetitive behaviors. Treatments include counseling, speech and physical therapy and medications.
Advocates say applied behavior analysis (ABA), in which a therapist reinforces positive behaviors in the patient, is essential to helping children with autism reach their full potential. ABA, developed in the 1960s, has become the most widely used autism treatment. But it requires hours of intensive, one-on-one therapy, and costs as much as $60,000 a year.
Depending on the severity of symptoms, a trained therapist using ABA may spend as many as 40 hours a week with a child. A new study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and the London School of Economics estimates the cost of treating a person with autism during his or her lifetime is $2.3 million. Autism costs Americans an estimated $126 billion annually, a number that has more than tripled since 2006.

Who opposes broad coverage of autism treatments?

ABA is endorsed by the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the U.S. Surgeon General. But insurance companies often object to paying for it because they say it is unproven and is largely educational, not medical. The Council for Affordable Health Insurance, an organization of insurance professionals, small businesses and health care providers, also argues that covering ABA is so costly it causes insurance premiums to rise, making basic health coverage unaffordable for millions of Americans.

What have states done to help ensure coverage of autism therapies?

Starting with Indiana in 2001, a total of 34 states and the District of Columbia have enacted autism insurance mandates, requiring carriers within their borders to provide coverage of ABA and other autism treatments in some or all of their policies.
States require insurers to cover nearly 2,300 categories of illness, treatments, and screenings.  Every state with an autism mandate requires insurers to cover ABA for state employees. Beyond that, state laws vary widely. Some apply only to individual health policies, while others include small group and large corporate policies. (No state mandates apply to the self-funded policies large employers typically offer, which is the type of coverage one-quarter of insured Americans have.)
Last year, the federal government began requiring coverage of ABA for the nation’s 8 million federal employees, retirees and their dependents.  Insurance coverage for members of the military also includes ABA treatments, with some restrictions.

Will existing state insurance mandates apply to policies sold on the state insurance exchanges?

Maybe.
The ACA says state insurance mandates in place before Dec. 31, 2011 may apply to policies offered on the exchanges.  If a state requires commercial carriers to cover ABA, that same requirement may be applied to policies sold on its exchange.
However, when the administration directed states to define “essential benefits,” every state either chose a “benchmark plan” (defined as the small business plan in the state with the most beneficiaries) or let the federal government choose a similar plan for them. If a state’s benchmark plan includes a requirement to cover ABA and other autism treatments, then all the plans on its exchange must do the same.
But in 11 of the 34 states with autism mandates, the benchmark plan does not include autism coverage, according to an analysis by advocates Autism Speaks. In those states, as well as the 16 states without autism mandates, state officials have the option of adding autism coverage as a required “supplemental” plan.
In Ohio, where the legislature is currently considering an autism bill, Gov. John Kasich, a Republican, mandated autism coverage by executive order in December 2012.  Alaska’s insurance chief, Bret Kolb, wrote to state lawmakers last month confirming that Alaska’s newly-minted autism mandate would apply to policies sold on the federally-run exchange.

How do state mental health parity laws affect autism patients?

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, every state but Wyoming now has a mental health parity law on the books, requiring that when insurers cover mental illness and/or substance abuse they do so on an equal financial basis with physical illnesses.  A federal law – the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Act of 2008 – also requires equal treatment, but the Obama administration has yet tocomplete the federal rules that would enable states to enforce it.
Parity laws only require carriers to pay as much for mental health treatments as they pay for medical treatments, with the same co-pays, deductibles and coverage limitations. The laws do not require carriers to cover specific treatments, such as ABA treatments. Still, state parity laws, combined with mandates, will maximize coverage for any given child.

What is “habilitation” and how does it affect autism coverage?

The federal government lists 10 categories of health care services states must include in their essential benefits. Two relate to autism: mental health services and habilitation, which is defined as therapies for children with developmental disabilities. In accepting state benchmark plans last year, HHS told states they must spell out what services are covered under habilitation. The way states define habilitation and how that plays out after 2014, when insurance companies begin processing claims, remains to be seen.

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Insurance Coverage for Autism Extended in CA

This just in from Dr. Vismara. Great to see everyone's efforts paying off in California!  Best, Donna

steinberg-lh-masthead




                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Dear Colleagues.. please see the following press release..Although there is still important work ahead,  this is an important step in the right direction. Many thanks to all who contributed to this crucial effort.  Cheers. Lou


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 9, 2013
Contact: Mark Hedlund, (916) 651-4006

Insurance Coverage for Autism Extended
                                                                                             
(Sacramento) – A program that has already helped more than 12,500 Californians receive insurance coverage for early autism treatment has now been extended an additional two-and-a-half years. Senate Bill 126, authored by Senate President pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) and passed unanimously by both the Assembly and the Senate, was signed into law today by Governor Jerry Brown.

SB 126 extends provisions of the California Autism Insurance Mandate requiring private health care insurance plans to provide coverage for “behavioral health treatment” of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. The program was originally established in 2011 under SB 946 (Steinberg), but the mandate was set to expire in July of next year. This law now extends the provisions until January 1, 2017.

“Earlier this year, I stood on the Capitol steps and called for an extension to help tens of thousands more receive autism behavioral health treatments. Today, that hope for more effective therapy is a reality for those who desperately need it,” said Steinberg. “I’m proud that California is leading the nation on ensuring treatments for those with autism.”

The bill also allows for the evaluation of recommendations by the Department of Managed Health Care Autism Taskforce, a process for licensure for providers and paraprofessionals of behavioral health treatments, coordination with the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), and assessment of future ACA guidelines.

Autism is the nation’s most rapidly growing serious developmental disability, as the number of those living with autism in the United States is 300 percent higher than it was in 2005. Nearly one in every 50 children in U.S. children exhibits signs of autism spectrum disorders. Research shows that early behavioral intervention therapies improve brain functions, promote higher cognitive functions and reduce self-injurious behaviors for a significant number of individuals with ASD.

Since the autism insurance mandate initially went into effect on July 1, 2012, the California Department of Insurance estimates annual taxpayer savings of up to $200 million in intervention costs from regional centers and special education programs.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

NEWS ALERT: UNITED HEALTHCARE AGREES TO COVER MEMBERS' SPEECH THERAPY SERVICES.

This great news just in from Dr. Lou Vismara in the CA. State Capitol. Thanks Lou!!

United Healthcare announced that it has reached an agreement with the California Department of Managed Health Care to stop denying coverage of speech therapy services to its members.  

Similar Settlement With Kaiser Permanente Foundation Health Plan. In 2012, DMHC reached a similar settlement with Kaiser Permanente Foundation Health Plan.  Since 2009, DMHC had received complaints from more than 100 Kaiser policy-holders who were denied coverage for the therapies because they lack a physical or mental health condition, according to agency documents.  Under the settlement, Kaiser agreed to cover medically necessary physical, occupational and speech therapy services and reimburse members who paid for such services out-of-pocket since January 2009. Details of New Agreement According to the agreement between DMHC and United Healthcare, the insurer will:

·    Provide coverage for medically necessary speech therapy services, as required by state law;
·    Reimburse members who paid out-of-pocket for such services in recent years; and
·    Revise all current health plan documents to reflect the changes.


The agreement went into effect Friday, and the state did not impose a financial penalty on the insurer.   UHC is required to notify all affected members of the change within 60 days and to notify all of its membership of the agreement in its November newsletter. Members have until July 30, 2014, to file for reimbursements. Reaction: DMHC Director Brent Barnhart said the agreement "ensures UHC enrollees needing speech therapy will receive the care to which they are entitled under the law.    "In a statement, UHC said that its original policy "was appropriate" but that the agreement was reached "to resolve this old issue"  For more information on the on how to obtain reimbursement for services, contact UHC’s Customer Service department at 1-800-624-8822.  The agreement is available at:  http://www.dmhc.ca.gov/library/reports/news/uhca.pdf. 

Thursday, August 16, 2012

News Alert: Insurance Update for California


Autism Society of Los Angeles Announces an important consumer alert from the California Dept. of Insurance about the new autism health insurance law. It lays out the specific rights of the insured individual to behavioral health treatments and speech and occupational therapies.

Please note that the law covers both children and adults. It also lists a website to file a complaint if coverage is denied.

If you or someone you know is being denied coverage by their insurance company, please contact the Autism Society of Los Angeles by e mail at execdirector@autism la.org. We are gathering this information to present to the California Department of Insurance. 

Please also note that the Department of Insurance covers only insurance companies. HMO's are covered by a different agency called the Department of Managed Health Care. If you are having any concerns with your HMO, please contact us at the email listed above. 
  
If you or someone you work with does not have health insurance or is covered by Medi-Cal, then the consumer should be receiving behavioral therapy through their regional centers.

*********end***********

PS:  I just got a letter from my insurance carrier stating they now cover Applied Behavioral Analysis and other evidence based behavioral health therapy. However they clearly stated that they will not cover:
  • Respite Care
  • Daycare
  • Educational services
  • Reimbursement to parent/guardian for providing care 

I'll post later on where to look for these supports :) 

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Compare Health Insurance Carriers


Just found this site for anyone who wants to compare their insurance with other carriers. Worth a peek.

Take health care into your own hands http://www.healthcare.gov/index.html

Comparing Care Providers

Tools to help you assess the quality of care you’re getting

The Affordable Care Act is designed not just to control health care costs, but also to improve quality of care. The federal government has created several tools that allow you to compare a variety of quality measures of health care and service providers. In addition, the Partnership for Patients program highlights hospitals and other providers that have made a commitment to reducing medical errors, improving health care quality, and reducing costs.

1.
Description: Visit the WebsitePartnership
for Patients
The Partnership for Patients includes hospitals, medical practices, and others that agree to support programs that improve patient safety, increase health care quality, and lower costs. Use our map to find members in your area and learn more about the Partnership, including information for current and prospective members.
2.
Description: Visit the WebsiteCompare Physicians
Use this tool to help you search for and compare physicians and other health professionals. It provides information on medical specialty, clinical training, foreign languages spoken, and more.
3.
Description: Visit the WebsiteCompare
Hospitals
This tool can help you compare the quality of care that hospitals provide. It provides a list of U.S. hospitals which includes hospital demographics (location, hospital type) and 44 quality-of-care measures. It also includes data on some Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers.
4.
Description: Visit the WebsiteCompare
Nursing
Homes
Use this tool to help you compare the quality of care that nursing homes provide. It provides a list of U.S. nursing homes which includes demographics (location and type of facility) and nursing home ratings, which include health inspection reports, staffing data, and quality measures.
5.
Description: Visit the WebsiteCompare
Home Health
Agencies
This tool can help you compare the quality of care that home health agencies provide. It provides a list of U.S. home health agencies, including demographics, services provided and quality measures.
6.
Description: Visit the WebsiteCompare
Dialysis
Facilities
Use this tool to help you compare the quality of care that dialysis facilities provide. It provides a list of U.S. dialysis facilities which includes services provided, quality measures, and resources.


Description: www.healthcare.gov
Description: HHS LogoA federal government website managed by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201

·         Accessibility
·         Privacy Policy
·         Plain Writing
·         Disclaimers
·         Viewers & Players
·         WhiteHouse.gov
·         USA.gov
·         GobiernoUSA.gov
Take Action
·         Find Insurance Options
·         Prevention & Wellness
·         Compare Care Providers
Get Help Using Insurance
·         Managing Your Insurance
·         Understanding Insurance
·         Free or Low-Cost Care
·         Medicare & Long-Term Care
·         Employers & Self-Employed
The Health Care Law and You
·         Read the Law
·         Key Features of the Law
·         Implementation Resources

Thursday, July 19, 2012

More Than 1/3 of Families Spend More Than 3 Percent of Their Gross Income on Services


Autism Law, Financial Burdens Leave Families Struggling With Health Care Needs

17 Jul 2012   

While the causes of autism continue to be debated and bandied about, real families who have children with autism spectrum disorders are left to struggle with expensive health care needs. These costs can be devastating - but they can also be markedly different if the family lives in Massachusetts or Maine. 

Advocates in many states have lobbied for legislation to force private insurers to offer autism services at the same levels as other covered services. A new study by Susan Parish, the Nancy Lurie Marks Professor of Disability Policy at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management, looks at the effectiveness of these so-called parity laws in reducing families' financial burdens. It was published in the journal Intellectual and Development Disabilities. 

According to the National Conference of State Legislators, parity, as it relates to mental health and substance abuse, prohibits insurers or health care service plans from discriminating between coverage offered for mental illness, serious mental illness, substance abuse, and other physical disorders and diseases. In short, parity requires insurers to provide the same level of benefits for mental illness, serious mental illness or substance abuse as for other physical disorders and diseases. These benefits include visit limits, deductibles, copayments, and lifetime and annual limits. 

"We found that families who live in states that have passed parity legislation spent considerably less for their children with autism than families living in states without such legislation," Parish says. 

The study examined data from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, which includes a group of more than 2,000 children with autism living across the United States. 

Data revealed that more than one-third of the families reported spending more than three percent of their gross annual incomes on services for their children with autism. 

"Families raising children with autism incur exceptionally high out-of-pocket costs. These costs pay for things that insurance doesn't fully cover, like therapies and behavior management interventions," says Parish. "These services are often critically important to the well-being and development of children with autism." 

Where families live really matters, Parish concluded. Families living in states that had enacted so-called parity legislation had much lower financial burden than families who lived in states without such legislative protections. 

Data found that 60 percent of families in Massachusetts, Missouri, and Utah had out-of-pocket in excess of $500 annually. By comparison, 27 percent of Maine families spent above $500 annually. At the time the survey was collected, in 2005, Massachusetts, Missouri and Utah did not have parity legislation, but Maine did.

Furthermore, these findings were robust. Even after controlling for a host of characteristics including severity of the child's impairment, family income, and state wealth, families' financial burden was much less if they lived in states that had passed parity legislation. 

According to the advocacy group Autism Speaks, 30 states currently have enacted some form of legislation.